*yeah I haven't a clue why I'm posting this...but I wrote this paper in Freshman English (so four years ago)
Saving humans?
Thesis: Animals have feelings, so do humans, but human feelings aren't ignored when it comes to medical problems. Humans attack each other just like animals. Both are creatures on this planet and yet animals are treated like lesser beings. If there was no animals, humans wouldn’t be where they are today in the world. Animals provide everything for us, as they always seem to have. Now they provide a way for humans to experiment for human operations without having to hurt humans. The animals can’t protest, so it doesn’t matter what the animals think.
I.
Scientists beliefs on experimentation *caring or
cruel SIRS*
a.
Help save human lives
i.
Human lives are more important
b.
Animal groups are a little too extreme at times
i.
Attacks on scientists
c.
Take good care of the animals
II.
Violence towards scientists *terrorizing medical
research SIRS*
a.
Some scientists forced to quit jobs because of animal
extremists
i.
Breaking in to labs
ii.
Threats
iii.
Bombings of scientist homes
b.
Scientists have to choose between family and
work
i.
threats towards family members
c.
Police find Scientists names on hit lists
d.
Government more concerned about scientists
safety then the animals
III.
Treatment of animals
*caring or cruel*
a.
Environment
i.
varies on
places
ii.
many countries have restrictions on treatment of
the animals *US phase out EBSCO?*
iii.
scientists think animals wont preform well if in
environment that they hate
1.
want animals
to be happy
a.
live in
cages
b.
feed healthy diets
b.
Testing
i.
Monkeys
1.
IV.
Scientists doubts and thoughts*caring or cruel*
a.
Jane Goodall
i.
urges EU
to find alternative methods for finding cures
ii.
wants people to admit that its wrong to cause
pain on creatures with feelings
b.
some scientists doubt vivisection is accurate
because of human differences with animals *bad science EBSCO*
i.
drugs can have different affects on different
creatures
V.
Vivisection *why animal research is bad* *EBSCO*
a.
operating on living animals
i.
wrong because most human diseases are unique to
humans
1.
look at previous section
VI.
Not always helpful *bad science* *EBSCO*
a.
Opren
i.
Anti –rheumatic drug
ii.
Animal tested, said to be safe
1.
7 years of testing
iii.
Killed 76 people, injuring many
b.
AIDS drugs
i.
Merck’s drug
1.
Killed the animals so studies were shut
down
a.
Scientists figure that the drug would do
the same to humans
i.
Thought unethical
ii.
Crixivan
1.
Another drug
2.
Used alternative methods for testing
3.
Made using computer
4.
Used on humans
5.
When tests on dogs, all dogs died
6.
No comments:
Post a Comment